Department of Defense: technology contract and supplier research — Page 16

Matched contract records

• FA861717C6211 contract award

  Textron Aviation Defense · Department of Defense · 2017-04-14 · Reported $104.8M

  IGF::OT::IGF ACAT 1C JPATS POST PRODUCTION SUSTAINING ENGINEERING&PROGRAM MANAGMENT

• 0001 contract award

  MAXISIQ, Inc. · Department of Defense · 2015-09-22 · Reported $1.5M

  IGF::OT::IGF CYBER INSTALLATION AND CONFIGURATION

• FA881415C0007 contract award

  BlueHalo · Department of Defense · 2015-08-19 · Reported $3.0M

  IGF::OT::IGF TECHNOLOGY MATURATION FOR ROCKET ENGINE COMPONENT

• FA862215F8102 contract award

  COLSA Corporation · Department of Defense · 2015-02-27 · Reported $177.5M

  IGF::CL::IGF SCATI ENGINEERING, PROFESSIONAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES (EPASS) ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES (A&AS) SUPPORT IN SUPPORT OF PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER FOR MOBILITY DIRECTORATE (AFLCMC/WL)

• 0014 contract award

  BlueHalo · Department of Defense · 2011-07-18 · Reported $1.7M

  NEW TASK ORDER ENTITLED MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY (MDA)/ ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES MODELING AND SIMULATION (M&S) FRAMEWORK

• N0001911C0024 contract award

  Kratos Defense & Security Solutions · Department of Defense · 2011-01-28 · Reported $105.9M

  ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBSONIC AERIAL TARGET (SSAT)

• N6600110C5201 contract award

  BlueHalo · Department of Defense · 2010-09-20 · Reported $599K

  RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D)

Matched recipient profiles

• AeroVironment

  Arlington, VA, United States

  Defense manufacturer of unmanned aircraft and multi-domain robotic systems.

  AeroVironment's published portfolio spans unmanned systems, reconnaissance, precision strike, counter-UAS, directed energy and mission software. Listed products include Puma 3 AE, JUMP 20-X and several Switchblade configurations. Those are different product and mission families, so an aircraft carrying a reconnaissance sensor should be evaluated against a comparable offering rather than against a loitering munition simply because both appear under the company name. Offering context reviewed October 1, 2026.

  Name the exact system, payload, ground control and support package. Ask which training, spares, consumables, software and integrations are included, and which documented customer use applies to that configuration. For a partnership, identify the relevant product team and interface. Company-level awards can span the portfolio and should be checked before attributing them to a particular aircraft or munition.

• AllClear Aerospace & Defense

  United States

  AllClear Aerospace & Defense provides parts distribution, repair services, engineered products, and logistics support to keep U.S. and allied military aircraft mission-ready.

• Allen Control Systems, Inc.

  Austin, TX, United States

  Allen Control Systems develops robotic weapon stations using computer vision, machine learning, and autonomous fire control to counter unmanned aircraft and protect military forces.

• Amee Bay, LLC

  Chesapeake, VA, United States

  Amee Bay provides ship modernization and repair, rotating machinery services, and naval hull, mechanical, and electrical engineering for Navy and maritime customers.

• AMERICAN SYSTEMS Corporation

  United States

  AMERICAN SYSTEMS provides digital engineering, systems design, research and development, test and evaluation, information technology, and training for defense and federal programs.

• AM General LLC

  South Bend, IN, United States

  AM General engineers, manufactures, and supports specialized vehicles for military customers, including HUMVEE platforms, the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle A2, and other light tactical vehicles.

• Anduril Industries

  Costa Mesa, CA, United States

  Anduril develops defense products spanning autonomous aircraft, counter-drone systems, underwater vehicles, command-and-control software, and other mission systems.

  Anduril's published portfolio includes Ghost and Altius aircraft and Lattice software. The product and integration scope matter more than the broad label 'drone company': compare the specific aircraft, payload, software and support being offered. Offering context reviewed September 28, 2026.

  Ask which legal entity and product configuration would deliver the requirement, what integration is included, and which customer evidence applies to that configuration. An award matched to Anduril does not by itself identify the aircraft or software involved.

• Applied Intuition

  Mountain View, CA, US

  Applied Intuition develops simulation, data, and software infrastructure for deploying and testing autonomous systems, including autonomy solutions for defense and other mission-critical applications.

• Applied Research Associates

  Albuquerque, NM, United States

  Applies science and engineering to defense challenges through modeling and simulation, testing, rapid prototyping, autonomy, and mission-ready technologies.

• Applied Research Solutions, Inc.

  Beavercreek, OH, United States

  Applied Research Solutions is a small business providing research, engineering, and technical services to the Department of Defense and Intelligence Community.

• Array Labs, Inc.

  Redwood City, CA, United States

  Array Labs designs and operates radar satellites that work in coordinated clusters. Its synthetic-aperture radar and multistatic sensing systems support all-weather Earth imaging, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and space domain awareness.

• Astranis

  San Francisco, CA, United States

  Astranis develops compact geostationary communications satellites and dedicated bandwidth platforms, including programs serving government and defense users.

  Astranis describes small satellites for high orbits and MicroGEO dedicated satellite broadband, alongside government work in communications and position, navigation and timing. Building, operating and obtaining capacity from a satellite can involve different commercial arrangements. Define whether you need spacecraft capability, a mission partnership or an operated communications service before comparing the engagement. Offering context reviewed October 1, 2026.

  Ask what capacity, coverage, payload control and operating responsibilities are included in the specific service or spacecraft configuration. Map launch, ground equipment and commissioning dependencies, then identify the acceptance test and continuing support. Distinguish current contracted capabilities from a future product or mission roadmap in the evidence you share with a customer.

Showing 12 related records. Explore the full directory.

Awarding-unit breakdown

• Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

  Awarding hierarchy, not necessarily the end customer

  4 selected technology-related records in this awarding unit. Check the individual descriptions for the delivered work.

• Defense Contract Management Agency

  Awarding hierarchy, not necessarily the end customer

  18 selected technology-related records in this awarding unit. Check the individual descriptions for the delivered work.

• Defense Health Agency

  Awarding hierarchy, not necessarily the end customer

  2 selected technology-related records in this awarding unit. Check the individual descriptions for the delivered work.

• Defense Information Systems Agency

  Awarding hierarchy, not necessarily the end customer

  1 selected technology-related records in this awarding unit. Check the individual descriptions for the delivered work.

• Defense Logistics Agency

  Awarding hierarchy, not necessarily the end customer

  10 selected technology-related records in this awarding unit. Check the individual descriptions for the delivered work.

• Defense Threat Reduction Agency

  Awarding hierarchy, not necessarily the end customer

  7 selected technology-related records in this awarding unit. Check the individual descriptions for the delivered work.

• Department of the Air Force

  Awarding hierarchy, not necessarily the end customer

  130 selected technology-related records in this awarding unit. Check the individual descriptions for the delivered work.

• Department of the Army

  Awarding hierarchy, not necessarily the end customer

  69 selected technology-related records in this awarding unit. Check the individual descriptions for the delivered work.

• Department of the Navy

  Awarding hierarchy, not necessarily the end customer

  100 selected technology-related records in this awarding unit. Check the individual descriptions for the delivered work.

• Missile Defense Agency

  Awarding hierarchy, not necessarily the end customer

  2 selected technology-related records in this awarding unit. Check the individual descriptions for the delivered work.

• U.S. Special Operations Command

  Awarding hierarchy, not necessarily the end customer

  19 selected technology-related records in this awarding unit. Check the individual descriptions for the delivered work.

• Washington Headquarters Services

  Awarding hierarchy, not necessarily the end customer

  5 selected technology-related records in this awarding unit. Check the individual descriptions for the delivered work.

Technology described in these records

• Autonomous systems

  Purchase-description match, not supplier industry classification

  16 selected descriptions mention this technology. Categories can overlap; these are not spending shares.

• Drones and uncrewed aircraft

  Purchase-description match, not supplier industry classification

  28 selected descriptions mention this technology. Categories can overlap; these are not spending shares.

• Space and satellites

  Purchase-description match, not supplier industry classification

  15 selected descriptions mention this technology. Categories can overlap; these are not spending shares.

• Defense software and AI

  Purchase-description match, not supplier industry classification

  5 selected descriptions mention this technology. Categories can overlap; these are not spending shares.

• Defense cybersecurity

  Purchase-description match, not supplier industry classification

  6 selected descriptions mention this technology. Categories can overlap; these are not spending shares.

• Propulsion and hypersonics

  Purchase-description match, not supplier industry classification

  16 selected descriptions mention this technology. Categories can overlap; these are not spending shares.

• Sensors and electronic warfare

  Purchase-description match, not supplier industry classification

  20 selected descriptions mention this technology. Categories can overlap; these are not spending shares.

• Field communications

  Purchase-description match, not supplier industry classification

  3 selected descriptions mention this technology. Categories can overlap; these are not spending shares.

• Expeditionary support

  Purchase-description match, not supplier industry classification

  10 selected descriptions mention this technology. Categories can overlap; these are not spending shares.

• Counter-UAS technology

  Purchase-description match, not supplier industry classification

  2 selected descriptions mention this technology. Categories can overlap; these are not spending shares.

• Satellite communications

  Purchase-description match, not supplier industry classification

  7 selected descriptions mention this technology. Categories can overlap; these are not spending shares.

• Synthetic aperture radar

  Purchase-description match, not supplier industry classification

  4 selected descriptions mention this technology. Categories can overlap; these are not spending shares.

Showing 12 related records. Explore the full directory.

Notices naming this buyer

• Mgt, Species, Pollinators, Western Bumble bee Joint Base Elmendorf- Richardson, Alaska

  Grants.gov · Forecast — confirm announcement · Closing not reported · Observed 2026-10-13

  Responses to this Request for Statements of Interest will be used to identify potential organizations for this project. Approximately, $102,951.35, is expected to be available to support this project for Tasks 3.1-3.4 and the Optional Task for the Base Period. Additional funding may be available to the successful recipient for optional tasks and/or follow on work in subsequent years.NOTE: This project will be awarded under the authority of 10 USC 670c-1, Sikes Act: For projects for the implementation and enforcement of integrated natural resources management plans, priority shall be given to a

  Notice identity: W9126G-23-2-SOI-3250

  Planning / market research — not a confirmed application window

• National Defense Education Program (NDEP) Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Consortia Request for Information (RFI) for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Research & Engineering)

  Grants.gov · Forecast — confirm announcement · Closing not reported · Observed 2026-10-13

  Request for Information Request for Information: R&ENDEPSTEMFY22RFI; Agency/Office: Washington Headquarters Services/Acquisition Directorate (WHS/AD) on behalf of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Research & Engineering) Title: National Defense Education Program (NDEP) Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Consortia Request for Information (RFI) for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Research & Engineering) Disclaimer: The Department of Defense (DoD) may use responses to this request for information (RFI) to inform future solicitation / fun

  Notice identity: RANDENDEPSTEMFY22RFI

  Planning / market research — not a confirmed application window