How to use this guide to build a provider shortlist →
Current CMMC status
As of September 27, 2026, the Department has suspended the transition to CMMC Phase II requirements and future implementation milestones while it reviews the program. Phase I self-assessment requirements remain in place. The suspension does not remove contractors’ obligations to protect covered defense information under applicable contracts. Check the requirement in your solicitation or contract and the official CMMC program page before buying an assessment based on an assumed deadline. Read the July 13, 2026 announcement.
Start with the work and data, then choose a provider
A startup selling to the defense sector does not need to buy every CMMC service at once. Begin with the work you are pursuing, the information your team receives or creates, and the language in the solicitation, contract, or subcontract. Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) affect the security requirements you need to evaluate. If you are unsure what information is in scope, resolving that question is a better first engagement than scheduling a certification assessment.
- Identify the requirement. Read the relevant contract clauses and ask the prime contractor or contracting contact to clarify ambiguous data-handling requirements. Do not assume every defense customer or contract calls for the same CMMC level.
- Map where the information goes. Include email, file storage, engineering tools, laptops, cloud services, and outside partners that may process, store, or transmit the information. This map helps define an assessment boundary and the work a provider must price.
- Check your present security work. Gather existing self-assessment results, policies, system descriptions, and open remediation items. A consultant can help validate the scope and turn gaps into an implementation plan.
- Buy the next needed service. Seek readiness or implementation help for unresolved gaps; seek an authorized assessment only when it is required and the environment is ready. Recheck current program guidance before committing to a date.
For technical scoping, the Department’s Level 2 scoping guide explains how assets in an assessment scope are treated. Use it alongside current program guidance and your actual contract requirements.
What type of provider do you need?
Readiness consultant or Registered Provider Organization (RPO)
Use this kind of help to determine scope, review current practices, identify gaps, and plan remediation. Ask for specific outputs: a documented boundary, prioritized findings, assigned work, and a clear account of what the consultant will and will not implement. RPO status identifies a role in the Cyber AB ecosystem; it does not authorize a firm to issue a CMMC certification.
Implementation or managed security provider
Use one when your team needs help configuring systems, operating security controls, collecting evidence, or maintaining them after an initial project. Ask who owns each control and what happens when the engagement ends. If a provider hosts or manages systems containing FCI or CUI, include its services in your data-flow and scope discussion.
CMMC Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO)
An authorized C3PAO conducts an official CMMC Level 2 certification assessment. A readiness review or mock assessment is different. Confirm the organization’s current authorization in the Cyber AB Marketplace, and disclose any earlier advisory work so the assessment team can address independence. The Cyber AB says assessors who helped prepare an organization cannot assess that same organization.
A firm may advertise more than one kind of service. Ask which legal entity and team will perform each part of the work; do not infer assessment authority from a general “CMMC services” label. See the Cyber AB’s assessment roles.
Use the contract to identify the level and assessment path
The CMMC model ties security requirements to the information and systems used for the work: Level 1 addresses Federal Contract Information (FCI), while Level 2 addresses Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Level 2 can involve a self-assessment or a third-party assessment depending on the requirement; Level 3 is assessed by the DoD’s DIBCAC. With Phase II requirements suspended, do not infer a current certification deadline from an older rollout chart. The solicitation, contract, subcontract flow-downs, and current Department guidance determine what applies to your work.
| What you find | What to confirm | Useful next step |
|---|---|---|
| No CMMC clause or level is obvious | Whether FCI or CUI will be provided or generated, which systems handle it, and whether the prime or contracting office has a written flow-down requirement. | Ask the customer or prime to identify the clause, required level, assessment type, and affected systems before buying readiness or assessment work. |
| FCI and an explicit Level 1 requirement | The exact clause, affirmation or assessment requirement, applicable system boundary, and whether the requested status is current. | Map the FCI path and relevant systems; confirm the required self-assessment and record in the applicable DoD system. |
| CUI, a Level 2 requirement, or DFARS 252.204-7012 | Where CUI is handled, the applicable NIST SP 800-171 requirements, the specified Level 2 assessment path, and any subcontract flow-down. | Scope people, locations, endpoints, cloud services, and external providers; then confirm whether the contract requires a self-assessment or C3PAO certification. |
| A Level 3 requirement | The stated requirement and the DIBCAC assessment route for the systems performing the work. | Engage only after the requiring activity and contracting team confirm the requirement and the relevant system boundary. |
This is a scoping aid, not a determination that a contract requires a particular level. Read the live DoW CMMC status and guidance, the applicable DFARS 204.7504 clause guidance, and the contract itself. See the CMMC rule at 32 CFR Part 170.
Compare CMMC-related providers
Browse cybersecurity and CMMC provider profiles for capabilities, locations and contact links.
Use these published service descriptions to form a shortlist. They are not verified credentials, endorsements, or a claim that each firm can perform an official assessment. Confirm current status, scope, and independence directly before engaging a provider.
| Provider | Published service focus | Location |
|---|---|---|
| Afidence | Ohio technology and cybersecurity consultancy helping DoD contractors identify CMMC levels, assess NIST 800-171 gaps, plan remediation, and prepare required evidence. | Mason, Ohio, United States |
| A-LIGN | Offers readiness assessment, Level 1 advisory, and CMMC assessment services. | Tampa, Florida, United States |
| All Lines Technology | Pennsylvania technology services firm and CMMC RPO supporting defense contractors with assessment preparation, cybersecurity, cloud, and managed IT services. | Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania, United States |
| BlueKey IT | Texas managed IT and cybersecurity provider with dedicated CMMC readiness services for aerospace, defense, and technology suppliers, including CUI scoping, NIST SP 800-171 gap review, SPRS scoring, documentation, and assessment preparation. | Euless, Texas, United States |
| Braxton-Grant Technologies, Inc. | Maryland cybersecurity consulting firm providing NIST SP 800-171 pre-assessments and CMMC-oriented readiness support for organizations with DoD contracts, including CUI protection and documentation support. | Hanover, Maryland, United States |
| Bright Defense | Cybersecurity compliance consultancy offering continuous CMMC Level 1 and 2 support, managed compliance automation, security awareness, and virtual CISO services for organizations in the DoD supply chain. | Culver City, California, United States |
| BrightFlow Technologies | Regional managed IT and cybersecurity provider supporting defense contractors in North and South Carolina with CMMC gap assessment, remediation, documentation, and ongoing compliance support. | Greer, South Carolina, United States |
| Cantey Tech Consulting | Managed IT and cybersecurity consultancy combining CMMC compliance consulting, managed security, and co-managed IT for manufacturers, defense contractors, and other regulated organizations. | North Charleston, South Carolina, United States |
| CBIZ | CBIZ documents a technology-team engagement that evaluated a client's CMMC Level 2 posture, assessed CUI handling, reviewed evidence, developed remediation, and supported CMMC readiness through certification. | Cleveland, Ohio, United States |
| Centre Technologies | Centre Technologies guides government entities and DoD contractors through CMMC readiness assessments, gap analysis, remediation and ongoing compliance management for CUI environments. | Houston, Texas, United States |
| Century Solutions Group | Century Solutions Group provides CMMC compliance support and managed IT for Georgia defense contractors, including gap assessment, NIST 800-171 control mapping, SSP/POA&M documentation and ongoing managed security. | Tyrone, Georgia, United States |
| CIT (Computer Integration Technologies) | CIT provides 24/7 managed security for defense contractors, including CMMC readiness, NIST 800-171 alignment, CUI scoping, and ongoing managed detection and response. | Woodbury, United States |
| CliftonLarsonAllen (CLA) | CLA provides cybersecurity professionals who support government contractors with CMMC scope analysis, control implementation recommendations, and system-security-plan and policy development and implementation. | Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States |
| Coalfire | Assessment preparation, security testing and certification support for Defense Industrial Base organizations working toward CMMC Level 2. | Westminster, Colorado, United States |
| Consilien | Consilien provides end-to-end CMMC work for California defense contractors and manufacturers, including gap assessment, CUI scoping, SSP and POA&M development, enclave design, technical remediation and C3PAO readiness. | Torrance, California, United States |
| ControlCase | Compliance and cybersecurity assessment firm serving defense contractors with CMMC readiness consulting, Level 2 preparation, and authorized third-party assessment capabilities. | Fairfax, Virginia, United States |
| CoreRecon | Corpus Christi-based, veteran-owned cybersecurity and managed IT provider offering end-to-end NIST SP 800-171/CMMC compliance services for defense contractors and federal subcontractors in Texas, alongside managed cybersecurity. | Corpus Christi, Texas, United States |
| CTS Technology Solutions | Texas technology and managed services provider offering CMMC readiness, assessment, remediation, documentation, and ongoing support for DoD prime and subcontractors. | Little Elm, Texas, United States |
| CyberCrest Compliance | CyberCrest provides NIST 800-171 consulting, gap assessments, internal assessments, and support toward DoD assessment or CMMC certification for organizations protecting federal Controlled Unclassified Information. | Encinitas, California, United States |
| Cyber Defense Advisors | Cybersecurity advisory firm providing CMMC readiness support and guidance for Level 1 self-assessments and Level 2 C3PAO assessments. | Austin, Texas, United States |
| CyberSecOp | Cybersecurity consulting firm with aerospace-defense services and CMMC readiness, DFARS compliance, NIST 800-171 assessment, remediation, and advisory capabilities. | New York, New York, United States |
| Direct iT Corp | Boston-area managed IT and cybersecurity provider helping DoD contractors and subcontractors with CMMC scoping, gap analysis, policy remediation, systems implementation, self-assessment, monitoring, and audit preparation. | Waltham, Massachusetts, United States |
| Eide Bailly | U.S. accounting and advisory firm with an RPO practice supporting CMMC Level 1 and 2 preparedness, NIST 800-171-based controls, validation, and defense-supply-chain eligibility. | Fargo, North Dakota, United States |
| Elite Security Solutions | Elite Security Solutions provides facility-clearance lifecycle support, industrial-security operations, outsourced FSO services, CMMC readiness and classified-environment design. | Raleigh, North Carolina, United States |
| E-N Computers, Inc. | E-N Computers adds CMMC Level 2 compliance support to managed IT services for Virginia and Washington, DC defense contractors, including readiness review, SPRS baseline, SSP documentation and continuous monitoring. | Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States |
| Endurance IT | Endurance IT provides CMMC consulting services for government contractors, addressing CUI/FCI handling and cybersecurity requirements associated with DoD contracts. | Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States |
| Essential IT Services, Inc. | Kansas-based managed IT and cybersecurity provider with a dedicated CMMC service for DoD/defense-sector businesses, covering implementation of controls, assessments, employee training, continuous monitoring, and protection of CUI. | Wichita, Kansas, United States |
| Exceed Cybersecurity | Exceed Cybersecurity helps defense contractors build CMMC Level 2 compliance programs, maintain NIST SP 800-171 controls and prepare for assessment through assessor-informed readiness support. | Frederick, Maryland, United States |
| GS Consulting | Mission-technology and cybersecurity consulting firm helping government contractors map CUI, define system boundaries, review DFARS/CMMC requirements, assess SSPs and POA&Ms, and build remediation roadmaps. | Towson, Maryland, United States |
| GuidePoint Security | Offers CMMC assessments and advisory services covering scope, controls, remediation and readiness. | Herndon, Virginia, United States |
| Hive Systems | Hive Systems Defense Solutions provides CMMC readiness assessments and implementation support for defense contractors, aligned with NIST SP 800-171 and focused on CUI protection. | Richmond, Virginia, United States |
| IBSS Corp. | IBSS provides cybersecurity services and CMMC assessment capability for organizations in the federal and defense ecosystem; its site also identifies its Total Assure MSSP as a CMMC readiness partner for DoD contractors. | Silver Spring, Maryland, United States |
| inTech Consulting | inTech Consulting provides CMMC Level 1 and Level 2 readiness services for DoD contractors, including gap assessments, SPRS scoring, SSP/POA&M documentation and continuous monitoring across the Pacific Northwest. | Kent, Washington, United States |
| InterSec, Inc. | InterSec delivers cybersecurity and compliance services to federal, state, and commercial organizations and the Defense Industrial Base, including CMMC, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, DFARS, managed security, and testing services. | Herndon, Virginia, United States |
| Intrust IT | Cincinnati-based managed IT provider offering CMMC environment audits, gap identification, remediation roadmaps, framework alignment, and assessment preparation for DoD contractors and subcontractors handling FCI or CUI. | Cincinnati, Ohio, United States |
| IT Center | Southern California managed IT provider building and managing CMMC-compliant infrastructure for DoD contractors, including CUI boundary protection, SSP/POA&M documentation, 24/7 CUI monitoring, SPRS tracking and GCC High migration. | Corona, California, United States |
| KAMIND IT | KAMIND IT provides CMMC compliance services, gap assessments, CUI security, audit-readiness documentation, continuous monitoring and NIST 800-171 support for DoD contractors and defense/aerospace supply chains. | Lake Oswego, Oregon, United States |
| Keiter CPA | Keiter CPA provides CMMC readiness and remediation services, including scoping and virtual compliance-team support for DoD contractors handling CUI under NIST SP 800-171 requirements. | Glen Allen, Virginia, United States |
| Kieri Solutions | Offers readiness and gap analysis, compliance documentation, and CMMC Level 2 assessment services. | Laurel, Maryland, United States |
| KirkpatrickPrice | KirkpatrickPrice provides information-security audits and compliance assessments, including SOC, ISO, PCI, HIPAA, and CMMC-focused services. | Tampa, Florida, United States |
| KLC Consulting | KLC Consulting provides CMMC compliance programs for Defense Industrial Base organizations, including gap assessments, POA&M remediation, SSP/policy work, CUI marking, training, assessment coaching and post-certification support. | Framingham, Massachusetts, United States |
| KTL Solutions | KTL Solutions manages CMMC compliance programs for defense and government contractors, including POA&M tracking, SSP maintenance, continuous monitoring and audit readiness. | Frederick, Maryland, United States |
| LBMC | LBMC's cybersecurity team guides defense contractors through CMMC readiness and certification, helping identify CMMC obligations and meet DoD requirements for protecting FCI/CUI. | Brentwood, Tennessee, United States |
| Mainstay Technologies | Mainstay Technologies helps defense contractors prepare for CMMC and NIST 800-171/DFARS requirements through Registered Practitioner-led information-security support and audit preparation. | Manchester, New Hampshire, United States |
| McKonly & Asbury | McKonly & Asbury provides CMMC Level 2 certification services for DoD contractors and subcontractors, including CMMC mock assessment and preparation involving NIST SP 800-171, SSP and self-assessment work. | Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, United States |
| MDL Technology | Kansas City-area technology and cybersecurity provider offering CMMC readiness for defense contractors, including CUI scoping, assessment against the 110 NIST SP 800-171 controls, remediation, and ongoing monitoring/evidence maintenance. | North Kansas City, Missouri, United States |
| Moonshot Solutions | Regional Kansas managed IT and cybersecurity provider delivering end-to-end CMMC alignment, from scoping and gap identification through remediation planning and long-term sustainment, for defense/aerospace manufacturers and DoD contractors. | Overland Park, Kansas, United States |
| My ISO Consultants | My ISO Consultants provides CMMC certification-readiness and NIST SP 800-171 compliance consulting for defense contractors, DoD subcontractors, manufacturers, engineering firms and technology providers. | Crestline, California, United States |
| North Star IT | Colorado Front Range IT/security provider preparing defense and aerospace contractors for CMMC assessment, including CUI protection, NIST 800-171 gap assessment, SPRS scoring, remediation, documentation and compliant-cloud enclave work. | Northglenn, Colorado, United States |
| Ntiva | Ntiva provides managed IT and security services for government contractors, including CMMC and NIST SP 800-171 gap-assessment and compliance support. | McLean, Virginia, United States |
| Open Approach | Managed IT provider with a Fort Collins presence helping DoD contractors and subcontractors assess CMMC readiness, identify and remediate gaps, support documentation and operate secure, compliant environments. | Fort Collins, Colorado, United States |
| OSIbeyond | OSIbeyond provides managed IT, cybersecurity and CMMC solutions for DoD contractors, including support for assessment preparation and sustaining Level 2 compliance. | Rockville, Maryland, United States |
| Petronella Technology Group | Petronella Technology Group provides CMMC Level 1, 2 and 3 readiness services for DoD subcontractors and Defense Industrial Base suppliers, including a 110-requirement NIST SP 800-171 gap assessment, SPRS baseline, CUI boundary map and POA&M. | Raleigh, North Carolina, United States |
| PTG | PTG provides CMMC managed-services support covering advisory, NIST 800-171 gap analysis, risk management, SSP/POA&M preparation and technical implementation for aerospace and defense businesses. | Greenvale, New York, United States |
| Reasonable Tech Solutions | Maryland MSP providing CMMC gap assessments, NIST 800-171 assessments, CUI environment setup, remediation, and certification-readiness support for defense contractors. | Towson, Maryland, United States |
| Red River | Enterprise IT and cybersecurity provider offering an end-to-end CMMC solution that combines a Level 2 compliant managed-services environment with assessment expertise for organizations handling CUI. | Chantilly, Virginia, United States |
| Redspin | Redspin publishes CMMC assessment and preparation services alongside its Redspin Ready managed-cloud offering. | Columbia, Maryland, United States |
| RSI Security | RSI Security provides advisory, readiness, gap-assessment, and implementation support for NIST SP 800-171, including protection of CUI for DoD contractors. | Southlake, Texas, United States |
| RSM US | RSM US advises government contractors across the CMMC journey, including readiness, compliant-environment implementation and maintenance, CUI protection, and managed services. | Chicago, Illinois, United States |
| Rutter Networking Technologies | Managed IT and cybersecurity firm providing CUI scoping, identity and endpoint controls, Azure governance, backup, remediation management, and evidence practices for defense contractors and subcontractors. | Andover, Massachusetts, United States |
| Schellman | Schellman publishes independent assessment and certification services across SOC, federal compliance, ISO and other information-security frameworks. | Tampa, Florida, United States |
| Securafy | Ohio MSP and cybersecurity firm serving manufacturing and defense organizations with CMMC readiness, NIST 800-171 programs, and DoD contractor security support. | Columbus, Ohio, United States |
| Sedulous Consulting Services | Virginia cybersecurity consultancy supporting military contractors and supply-chain businesses with CMMC planning, vulnerability assessment, network defense, and NIST 800-171-related readiness. | Stafford, Virginia, United States |
| Sentinel Blue | Sentinel Blue provides CMMC compliance offerings including advisory, readiness, security operations, GovCloud, and certification support for defense contractors. | Warrenton, Virginia, United States |
| Sonic Systems | Southern California provider supporting defense contractors and subcontractors with CUI scoping, readiness assessment, NIST SP 800-171 remediation, SSP/POA&M documentation, evidence organization and ongoing IT operations. | Victorville, California, United States |
| SSE Inc. | SSE provides NIST SP 800-171 compliance consulting and CMMC readiness/gap assessments for defense contractors and organizations handling CUI. | St. Louis, Missouri, United States |
| Steadfast Partners | Steadfast Partners provides CMMC consulting for Denver-area organizations in aerospace, defense and federal supply chains, including readiness assessment, NIST SP 800-171 gap analysis, policy development, safeguards, evidence management and third-party assessment preparation. | Denver, United States |
| Stratify IT | Stratify IT provides CMMC consulting for defense contractors, including gap analysis across the NIST SP 800-171 practices, SSP and POA&M planning, control deployment, CUI scoping and C3PAO readiness. | New York, New York, United States |
| Stratus Services | Stratus Services provides CMMC consulting, secure-environment implementation and managed services for defense contractors, with experience implementing NIST SP 800-171 controls. | Anchorage, Alaska, United States |
| Strike Graph | Strike Graph combines compliance software and advisory support to help organizations build and manage security programs, including CMMC and other common frameworks. | Houston, Texas, United States |
| Summit 7 Systems | CMMC Level 2 gap analysis, SSP and POA&M support, SPRS support, implementation and managed services. | Huntsville, Alabama, United States |
| SysArc | SysArc conducts NIST SP 800-171 assessments and audits for DoD contractors and offers a managed path to CMMC Level 2 compliance. | Rockville, Maryland, United States |
| TechHeights | TechHeights provides CMMC advisory, control implementation and managed services for aerospace companies, government contractors and the defense supply chain. | Irvine, California, United States |
| Telco United | Wyoming cybersecurity provider offering fixed-price CMMC preparation for defense contractors and DIB suppliers, including NIST SP 800-171 implementation and C3PAO readiness. | Sheridan, Wyoming, United States |
| The Scarlett Group | Southeastern managed IT and cybersecurity consultancy offering CMMC readiness assessments, NIST 800-171 gap analysis, DFARS alignment, monitoring, and ongoing compliance support. | Jacksonville, Florida, United States |
| Thrive | Thrive helps U.S. federal contractors prepare for CMMC, covering NIST 800-171 compliance, technical controls, policy development, and CMMC-compliant managed IT/security services. | Foxborough, Massachusetts, United States |
| Triton Technologies | New England managed IT and cybersecurity provider delivering assessor-ready CMMC Level 2 packages, including SSP, POA&M, CUI inventory, SPRS scoring, technical controls, and managed security for defense manufacturers and subcontractors. | Worcester, Massachusetts, United States |
| Uprite | Uprite builds and manages assessment-ready IT environments for Texas defense contractors, with gap assessment, remediation, encrypted CUI environments and documentation mapped to CMMC Level 2 and NIST SP 800-171. | Houston, Texas, United States |
| Vancord | Vancord supports Connecticut defense contractors with CMMC readiness, NIST SP 800-171 gap assessments, documentation, remediation, and ongoing compliance. | Milford, Connecticut, United States |
| VC3 | VC3 provides IT support, cybersecurity and CMMC compliance services for aerospace and defense organizations, including guidance on NIST standards and maintaining certification. | Columbia, South Carolina, United States |
| Vicinity | Alaska-based managed service provider and CMMC RPO supporting defense contractors with gap assessment, CUI cloud and enclave design, managed cybersecurity, SOC monitoring, and certification preparation. | Anchorage, Alaska, United States |
| VisioneerIT | VisioneerIT helps federal contractors and defense firms with CMMC/DFARS compliance automation, cybersecurity, governance and related technology support. | Baltimore, Maryland, United States |
| WCC Technologies | WCC Technologies offers CMMC services for Southern California's defense industrial base, including gap assessment, SPRS scoring, SSP authorship, NIST 800-171 control implementation and CMMC-aligned security operations. | Chino, California, United States |
| WingSwept | Employee-owned North Carolina MSP providing managed IT and cybersecurity designed for defense contractors with CMMC requirements, including CUI-sensitive environments. | Garner, North Carolina, United States |
| Workplace IT | Denver-based provider offering statewide CMMC services for Colorado defense contractors, including 110-control NIST 800-171 gap assessments, SSP/POA&M documentation, continuous monitoring and managed IT plus CMMC. | Denver, Colorado, United States |
Compare quotes by scope, not by the headline price
CMMC work has no dependable flat price for every startup. Cost and schedule depend on the number and complexity of systems and locations in scope, where FCI or CUI flows, how much of the environment can inherit security from an eligible cloud service, the state of existing policies and evidence, the remediation backlog, and whether ongoing operations or an independent assessment are included. Ask providers to price those pieces separately and show the assumptions that could change the estimate.
Request the same written scope from each finalist. Use this checklist to make the bids comparable:
- Boundary: people, facilities, devices, networks, cloud services, business systems, and outside providers included or excluded.
- Starting point: existing assessments, policies, evidence, open findings, and technical work the provider assumes is already complete.
- Deliverables: gap analysis, system boundary or diagram, remediation plan, implementation tasks, evidence package, training, and continuing support.
- Assessment: self-assessment support, mock/readiness review, or official C3PAO assessment, with the organization and team responsible for each clearly named.
- Commercial terms: fixed fee or time and materials, milestone payments, exclusions, change-order rates, schedule dependencies, and who owns the resulting documentation and configurations.
If quotes differ substantially, ask each provider to explain its boundary and exclusions before assuming one is a better deal. A short paid scoping phase can be useful when the environment is not yet clear; get its output and decision point in writing.
Prepare a one-page brief before requesting quotes
A useful brief lets providers quote the same job. State the contract or opportunity, the apparent FCI or CUI involved, your proposed scope, the number of people and locations, major systems and cloud services, existing security documentation, and the decision you need to make next. Include a target date only if it comes from a real procurement or internal commitment.
Then ask each provider to separate discovery, readiness review, remediation, ongoing operations, and any official assessment in its proposal. A low quote for “CMMC readiness” may cover only a gap report; another may include implementation and evidence collection. Those are different purchases.
Questions to ask every finalist
- Which deliverables will we receive, and can you show a redacted example?
- Who defines the boundary, and how will you handle our cloud tools, remote staff, and subcontractors?
- Which tasks will your team perform, and which remain with our employees or other vendors?
- What assumptions drive the fee and schedule? What changes would increase either one?
- Who will retain and maintain the documentation, evidence, and system configurations after the project?
- If you also offer assessments, how will you avoid a conflict with work you did to prepare us?
Common purchasing mistakes
Booking an assessment before defining scope: the provider cannot give a dependable price or schedule if no one can identify where CUI lives. Start with a bounded discovery or scoping engagement.
Buying software as a substitute for implementation: a tool can support a security practice, but someone still has to configure it, operate it, and show how the organization meets the applicable requirement. Ask how a proposed product changes the work and who owns that work.
Comparing unlike quotes: request the same deliverables and boundary from each bidder, and ask for exclusions in writing. Separate a one-time readiness review from remediation and continuing managed services.
Relying on an old deadline or badge: program milestones and provider status can change. Check current Department guidance and the Cyber AB Marketplace at the point of purchase.
Common questions
Can a consultant certify my organization?
No. An official Level 2 certification assessment is performed by an authorized C3PAO. Consultants and RPOs can help with readiness and implementation.
Should we stop security work because Phase II is suspended?
No. Phase I self-assessment requirements remain in place, and applicable contract obligations to safeguard covered defense information continue. The sensible next step depends on your contracts, data, and existing security gaps.
Does this directory verify provider credentials?
No. Listings describe services using provider information and researched sources. Check the current credential in the Cyber AB Marketplace, confirm the proposed team’s role, and ask about independence before signing.
How much does CMMC compliance cost?
There is no single reliable price for every company. Scope, existing controls, remediation, cloud and provider dependencies, ongoing operations, and the required assessment route all affect cost. Compare proposals against the same boundary and deliverables.
For the broader path into defense procurement, see our guide to getting your first government contract.
Build a CMMC budget from your scope and actual quotes
A small environment with a defined information boundary and a distributed engineering business can need very different work. A national “average CMMC cost” is not a useful purchasing budget unless its assumptions match yours. Start by separating external cash costs from your team’s time.
| Budget component | Ask the provider to specify | Common omission |
|---|---|---|
| Scoping and readiness | Systems, sites, people and data flows reviewed; written findings and remediation priorities. | Discovering additional systems after the quote. |
| Remediation and implementation | Configuration work, migrations, policies, testing and evidence handoff. | Assuming the consultant will implement recommendations. |
| Assessment, if required | Assessment type, authorized team, scope assumptions, travel and follow-up charges. | Treating a mock assessment as certification. |
| Recurring operations | Licenses, managed services, evidence maintenance, training and review cadence. | Budgeting only for the initial project. |
| Internal work | Owner, expected hours, information gathering, engineering interruptions and continuing tasks. | Counting employee time as both an external fee and an internal cost. |
How to use the workbook
- Record the requirement, boundary and quote date. Set a common planning period in months.
- Enter each one-time and recurring external cost. Use zero only when you have confirmed no cost; leave unknowns blank.
- Estimate internal hours and an hourly planning rate separately. The workbook shows external spend, internal time value and their combined planning total.
- Record the source and assumptions for each amount. Include exclusions or additional charges in the quote comparison.
- Change the planning period to see the effect of recurring services. Update the inputs if the boundary or required assessment changes.
This is a planning worksheet with no vendor price benchmarks. It does not predict assessment outcomes or determine whether an assessment is required.
Your next step
Write down the contract requirement and information boundary, then complete one project brief for every shortlisted provider. Compare their deliverables and exclusions before comparing the budget totals.